Array of size 1 vs. pointer to struct

Question

Let's say I have a function which takes an array of structs, defined like so:

void Foo(struct MyStruct *s, int count) {
    for (int i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
        // Do something with s[i]
    }
}

Are these following two snippets guaranteed to behave the same way?

struct MyStruct s;
s.x = 0;
s.y = 0;
Foo(&s, 1);

vs.

struct MyStruct s[1]; // stack-allocated array of size 1
s[0].x = 0;
s[0].y = 0;
Foo(s, 1);

Answer 1

The answer is yes, they are effectively the same. First, arrays are passed as pointer to its first element, when used in function arguments. Actually, all objects in C can be treated as a array of one element of that type in terms of storage.

Answer 2

They are identical; proof - I compiled and saved the assembly code generated by both MSVC 2015 and GCC 4.9.3 for these two code samples:

// Case 1: Pass by reference to single struct
typedef struct _mystruct
{
    int x;
    int y;
} mystruct;

void foo(mystruct *s, int count)
{
    int i;
    for(i = 0; i < count; i++)
    {
        (*(s + i)).x = 5; 
        (*(s + i)).y = 7;
    }
}

int main()
{
    mystruct ps;

    //mystruct as[1];


    foo(&ps, 1);
    //foo(as, 1);
    return 0;
}

I note that the operations in foo are random and not really relevant to the test; they are just to prevent the compiler from optimizing out the method.

// Case 2: 1-length array
typedef struct _mystruct
{
    int x;
    int y;
} mystruct;

void foo(mystruct *s, int count)
{
    int i;
    for(i = 0; i < count; i++)
    {
        (*(s + i)).x = 5; 
        (*(s + i)).y = 7;
    }
}

int main()
{
    //mystruct ps;

    mystruct as[1];


    //foo(&ps, 1);
    foo(as, 1);
    return 0;
}

In the generated assembly files, on GCC they are exactly identical, and in MSVC, literally the only differences are:

1. The variable names in the comments (s vs as)
2. The line numbers referenced (since different ones are uncommented in each version).

Therefore, it is safe to assume that these two methods are identical.