C++ code standard is defined by the International Organization of Standardization (ISO). There are many different implementations of C++ like GCC/G++, libc/libc++, clang (++ too), Microsoft Visual C++, Intel C++ Compiler etc. so Anyone can make his own implementations (compiler etc, runtime library, ...) and call it C++.
I wanted to know:
There appeared to be a scientific basis for developmental trends and patterns in supervision. In general, the developmental model of supervision defines progressive stages of supervisee development from beginner to expert, with each stage consisting of discrete characteristics and skills.
While group therapy and a practicum was at the core of the supervisees experiences, the most important aspect of supervision Roger’s suggested was in the supervisors modelling of the necessary and sufficient conditions of empathy, genuineness, and unconditional positive regard.
The Discrimination model provides a tangible structure for the supervisor to use in selecting a focus for supervision and in determining the most effective way to deliver particular supervision interventions (Luke & Bernard, 2006).
It consists of building rapport, skill analysis and assessment of the supervisee, setting goals (for the supervisee), implementation of strategies, follow-up and evaluation.
It's totally up to compilers vendors.
One of the reasons why C++14 standard itself is being developed openly on GitHub is because before that it was relatively obscure and hard for vendors/implementors to follow what is happening behind closed doors of various WGs.
With C++14 ISO is trying to make vendors aware of the changes beforehand, participate in shaping and also know what is expected of them and voice their opinion if they see any problems.
AFAIK many of compiler developers are (and have always been) on the ISO committee, but not all of them managed to implement all things in time. Notoriously, MSVC took a while to implement 'noexcept'. GCC's libstdc++ is lagging behind quite badly, although it's more speed-optimized than clang's libc++.
AFAIK, clang is the only compiler to have all c++11 and c++14 features done and then some outside the standard scope (see below in that page). libc++ is also very modern and supports c++11 fully (or 99% fully for that matter).
Hopefully, the example ISO committee sets now with how the standard is developed will set the bar for vendors to implement it quickly and correctly, and not 10 years later.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With