Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Are Java static initializers thread safe?

People also ask

Are static variables thread safe Java?

Static variables are not thread safe. Instance variables do not require thread synchronization unless shared among threads. But, static variables are always shared by all the threads in the process.

Is static block thread safe Java?

Static block is always thread safe while its getting initialzed. This is the reason use static variable of singleton object as one way of creating singleton object (singelton desing pattern).

What is true about static initializers in Java?

A Static Initialization Block in Java is a block that runs before the main( ) method in Java. Java does not care if this block is written after the main( ) method or before the main( ) method, it will be executed before the main method( ) regardless.

Why ++ is not thread safe in Java?

Example of Non-Thread-Safe Code in Java The above example is not thread-safe because ++ (the increment operator) is not an atomic operation and can be broken down into reading, update, and write operations.


Yes, Java static initializers are thread safe (use your first option).

However, if you want to ensure that the code is executed exactly once you need to make sure that the class is only loaded by a single class-loader. Static initialization is performed once per class-loader.


This is a trick you can use for lazy initialization

enum Singleton {
    INSTANCE;
}

or for pre Java 5.0

class Singleton {
   static class SingletonHolder {
      static final Singleton INSTANCE = new Singleton();
   }
   public static Singleton instance() {
      return SingletonHolder.INSTANCE;
   }
}

As the static block in SingletonHolder will run once in a thread safe manner you don't need any other locking. The class SingletonHolder will only get loaded when you call instance()


In usual circumstances everything in the static initialiser happens-before everything that uses that class, so synchronisation is not usually necessary. However, the class is accessible to anything that the static intiailiser calls (including causing other static initialisers to be invoked).

A class can be loaded by a class loaded but not necessarily initialised straight away. Of course, a class can be loaded by multiples instances of class loaders and thereby become multiple classes with the same name.


Yes, sort of

A static initializer only gets called once, so by that definition it's thread safe -- you'd need two or more invocations of the static initializer to even get thread contention.

That said, static initializers are confusing in many other ways. There's really no specified order in which they're called. This gets really confusing if you have two classes whose static initializers depend on each other. And if you use a class but don't use what the static initializer will set up, you're not guaranteed the class loader will invoke the static initializer.

Finally, keep in mind the objects you're synchronizing on. I realize this isn't really what you're asking, but make sure your question isn't really asking if you need to make addController() thread-safe.