Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Are arguments passed to methods by reference or value?

Tags:

People also ask

Is the argument a passed by value or reference?

When a function is called, the arguments in a function can be passed by value or passed by reference. Callee is a function called by another and the caller is a function that calls another function (the callee). The values that are passed in the function call are called the actual parameters.

How is an argument passed to a method?

Arguments are passed by value. When invoked, a method or a constructor receives the value of the variable passed in. When the argument is of primitive type, "pass by value" means that the method cannot change its value.

Are Java arguments passed by value or reference?

Java is officially always pass-by-value. The question is, then, “what is passed by value?” As we have said in class, the actual “value” of any variable on the stack is the actual value for primitive types (int, float, double, etc) or the reference for reference types.

How are arguments passed by references?

Pass-by-reference means to pass the reference of an argument in the calling function to the corresponding formal parameter of the called function. The called function can modify the value of the argument by using its reference passed in. The following example shows how arguments are passed by reference.


Can anyone expand upon, correct, or verify what I feel is happening when you pass arguments to a method in Ruby. Are any of these points wrong? Am I missing any pieces?

  • Everything in Ruby is an object.
  • Variables are references to objects
  • (When passing in a variable into a method): The parameter in the method that catches the variable is a local variable to that method. The parameter (local variable) now also has a reference to the same object.
  • I could alter the object (in place) and this alteration will hold when the method scope is exited. Any variables referencing this object outside the method scope will reflect that the object has been altered.
  • A new assignment to that parameter (local variable) does not change the original object, thus any references to it when the method leaves scope will remain unchanged.
  • If I am passing a variable into the method that references an Integer there is effectively no way that once that method exits I could have that variable referencing a new Integer.

Is there any way to have a method that takes as one of its parameters an Integer, does some stuff, and maybe as a side effect changes the value, having that change reflected once the method exits. Maybe I am just not thinking "the Ruby way".