Using Python3.5.3 in Spyder 3.1.3 on Raspbian on a Raspberry Pi. Appending two numpy-arrays to a list named 'list0' works well with allocated numpy arrays 'a' like:
import numpy as np
list0 = []
a = np.array([[1,2,3],[2,3,4]])
list0.append(a)
a = np.array([[11,12,13],[12,13,14]])
list0.append(a)
print("list0 =",list0)
works well, giving as output (a bit better formatted for the post):
list0 = [ array([[ 1, 2, 3], [ 2, 3, 4]]),
array([[11, 12, 13], [12, 13, 14]]) ]
Replacing the assignment to a using a loop, weird things happen:
import numpy as np
a = np.empty((3), int)
list0 = []
for idx in range(4):
for i in range(3):
a[i] = idx*10 + i
print("idx =",idx,"; a =",a)
list0.append(a)
print("list0 =",list0)
The second line tells Python the shape of the array used (in my original case it is a three-dimensional array). For verification the generated arrays named 'a' are printed out. Appending the newly filled arrays 'a' to 'list0' finally shows four times the last line.
idx = 0 ; a = [ 0 1 2]
idx = 1 ; a = [10 11 12]
idx = 2 ; a = [20 21 22]
idx = 3 ; a = [30 31 32]
list0 = [ array([30, 31, 32]), array([30, 31, 32]),
array([30, 31, 32]), array([30, 31, 32]) ]
I suppose that 'list0' simply contains four times a pointer to the array 'a' which only exists in one instance / memory range.
So: How can I physically append (copy?) each of the different arrays 'a' to the list? Is it a python bug or is it simply my misunderstanding of something? Certainly I should think more pythonian ;c)
Thanks for help, Peter
NumPy: append() function The append() function is used to append values to the end of an given array. Values are appended to a copy of this array. These values are appended to a copy of arr. It must be of the correct shape (the same shape as arr, excluding axis).
Appending to numpy arrays is very inefficient. This is because the interpreter needs to find and assign memory for the entire array at every single step. Depending on the application, there are much better strategies. If you know the length in advance, it is best to pre-allocate the array using a function like np.
array(a) . List append is faster than array append .
If you are using List as an array, you can use its append(), insert(), and extend() functions. You can read more about it at Python add to List. If you are using array module, you can use the concatenation using the + operator, append(), insert(), and extend() functions to add elements to the array.
You're appending the same array a
to your list0
4 times. Arrays like a
are mutable objects, which means, among other things, that when you assign values to them the underlying object changes. Since the array is present in your list 4 times, those changes (seem to) show up in 4 different places.
You can fix the code you have with one small change. Append a copy of the array to your list, instead of the array itself:
import numpy as np
a = np.empty((3), int)
list0 = []
for idx in range(4):
for i in range(3):
a[i] = idx*10 + i
print("idx =",idx,"; a =",a)
list0.append(a.copy())
print("list0 =",list0)
Output:
idx = 0 ; a = [0 1 2]
idx = 1 ; a = [10 11 12]
idx = 2 ; a = [20 21 22]
idx = 3 ; a = [30 31 32]
list0 = [array([0, 1, 2]), array([10, 11, 12]), array([20, 21, 22]), array([30, 31, 32])]
Python/Numpy offer many better ways (both in terms of using fewer lines of code and running faster) to initialize arrays. For a bunch of ranges like this, here is a reasonable approach:
list0 = [np.arange(n*10, n*10+3) for n in range(4)]
print(list0)
Output:
[array([0, 1, 2]), array([10, 11, 12]), array([20, 21, 22]), array([30, 31, 32])]
You might also consider just using a single 2D array in place of a list of arrays. One single array is often easier to work with than a heterogenous mix of arrays in a list. Here's how you do that:
arr0 = np.array([np.arange(n*10, n*10+3) for n in range(4)])
print(arr0)
Output:
[[ 0 1 2]
[10 11 12]
[20 21 22]
[30 31 32]]
Just do this:
list_to_append.append(np_array.copy())
In a nutshell, numpy arrays or lists are mutable objects, which means that you when you assign a numpy array or list to a variable, what you are really assigning are references to memory locations aka pointers.
In your case, "a" is a pointer, so what you are really doing is appending to list0 an address to the memory location pointed by "a", and not the actual values pointed by the pointer. Thus it means that each new position of "list0", after appending, turns out to be the same address of memory: "a".
So, instead of:
list0.append(a)
You call the copy() method of "a" that creates a new memory location for the new values of "a" and returns it:
list0.append(a.copy())
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With