Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Apache Camel: do Processors and Beans serve the same purpose?

Tags:

apache-camel

It seems like both serve the same purpose. Is there any difference that makes one useful in certain situations and not the other ?

like image 317
redben Avatar asked May 19 '11 16:05

redben


People also ask

What is processor in Apache Camel?

The Processor is used for processing message Exchanges. The processor is a core Camel concept that represents a node capable of using, creating, or modifying an incoming exchange.

What is Bean in Camel?

Bean as endpointThe source for the bean is just a plain POJO: Camel will use Bean Binding to invoke the sayHello method, by converting the Exchange's In body to the String type and storing the output of the method on the Exchange Out body.

What Apache Camel is used for?

Apache Camel ™ is a versatile open-source integration framework based on known Enterprise Integration Patterns. Camel empowers you to define routing and mediation rules in a variety of domain-specific languages (DSL, such as Java, XML, Groovy, Kotlin, and YAML).


2 Answers

In practice, they are very similar, but a Processor is more limited than a Bean. I generally use a Processor for simple use cases that just interact with the Exchange. Also, inline processors are a great way to interact without having to create a separate class.

Beans provide more flexibility and also support a true POJO approach. This allows you to more easily integrate with existing APIs (just need to convert the inputs/outputs to match, etc).

Beans also provide great features/flexibility with regards to Camel routing/EIP integration, including...

  • rich set of bindings that allow you to quickly bind data from the Exchange to attributes of a bean method, etc.

  • POJO consuming/producing allow you to interact with endpoints in a reusable manner

  • used as expressions/predicates (for POJO EIP implementation...filters, etc)

like image 87
Ben ODay Avatar answered Oct 15 '22 01:10

Ben ODay


Boils down to a matter of preference, I'd say. I generally opt for the POJO approach and so I started using beans to do my processing, but over time I've slowly moved to using Processors.

I was feeling pain in the following cases:

  • Bean methods with more than one parameter
  • Trying to get data out of the exchange params / the message headers

I know that Camel 2.8 takes out some of the pain of these cases by allowing annotations in your bean which guide Camel on how to call your bean's methods. I didn't want to go this route -- felt wrong to put Camel annotations into a bean that shouldn't care that it's being called by Camel.

In the end we created an annotation-free, client-agnostic bean and a very thin Processor that pulls everything it needs from camel and passes it to that bean.

Just my 2 cents - the bean route really isn't a bad one - it'll do the job just as well (esp in 2.8)

EDIT

Many improvements have been made to camel's use of POJOs to process messages since this was written - this answer may no longer be applicable.

like image 32
Roy Truelove Avatar answered Oct 15 '22 01:10

Roy Truelove