What is the best way to get all but the last N elements of an iterator in Python? Here is an example of it in theoretical action:
>>> list(all_but_the_last_n(range(10), 0))
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
>>> list(all_but_the_last_n(range(10), 2))
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
Method #2 : Using islice() + reversed() The inbuilt functions can also be used to perform this particular task. The islice function can be used to get the sliced list and reversed function is used to get the elements from rear end.
Get the last element of the list using the “length of list - 1” as an index and print the resultant last element of the list. Get the last element of the list using − 1(negative indexing) as the index and print the resultant last element of the list.
Any element in list can be accessed using zero based index. If index is a negative number, count of index starts from end. As we want second to last element in list, use -2 as index.
Just for the fun of it, here's a variation on Ignacio's solution that doesn't require a deque.
>>> def truncate(it, n):
... cache = [next(it) for i in range(n)]
... index = 0
... for val in it:
... val, cache[index] = cache[index], val
... index = (index + 1) % n
... yield val
I wasn't especially concerned with speed when I wrote the above... but perhaps this would be a tad faster:
def truncate(it, n):
cache = [next(it) for i in range(n)]
index = 0
for val in it:
yield cache[index]
cache[index] = val
index = (index + 1) % n
Use a collections.deque
. Push N
items from the source on the first invocation. On each subsequent invocation, pop an item out, push an item in from the source, and yield the popped item.
Based on Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams's description:
from collections import deque
def all_but_the_last_n(iterable, count):
q = deque()
i = iter(iterable)
for n in range(count):
q.append(i.next())
for item in i:
q.append(item)
yield q.popleft()
I wondered whether it was better to use the deque right to left (append, popleft) or left to right (appendleft, pop). So i timed it with python 2.5.2 and found that rtl was 3.59 usec
while ltr was 3.53 usec
. The difference of 0.06 usec
is not significant. the test was to append a single item and pop a single item.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With