I am getting unexpected results when running the following code for 32-bit x86 linux (compiler flags: g++ -std=c++14 -m32). I tried gcc and clang.
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
struct S1
{
uint64_t a;
uint32_t b;
};
struct S2
{
alignas(uint64_t) char a[8];
uint32_t b;
};
int main()
{
cout << "sizeof(S1)=" << sizeof(S1) << endl;
cout << "sizeof(S2)=" << sizeof(S2) << endl;
}
The output is:
sizeof(S1)=12
sizeof(S2)=16
What is happening here? Why are S1 and S2 of different size? As I understand it, 64 bit integer values are aligned to 32 bit on 32-bit x86 machines. This does explain why the size of S1 is 12 bytes. But why does this not apply to S2?
The alignof
keyword measures the alignment of a type as a complete object; i.e. when it is allocated as an individual object or array element. This is not necessarily the same as the alignment requirements of that type as a subobject; Are members of a POD-struct or standard layout type guaranteed to be aligned according to their alignment requirements?
The alignment of a 64-bit integer within a struct is mandated by the x386 ABI at 4 bytes; gcc is not at liberty to change this, as it would break binary compatibility with other object files and programs. However, it can align complete-object 64-bit integers to 8 bytes, as doing so does not affect the ABI, and makes for more efficient access to memory.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With