Menu
What are the advantages of using Akamai vs. CloudFront? From what I've read, Akamai seems to be more expensive but they seem to have a larger network for their CDN. CloudFront on the other end is newer and Amazon even used Akamai for their e-commerce site when CloudFront was launched in 2008. This might have changed since then which will not surprise me.
I like CloudFront because my application will be hosted on AWS so there might be significant benefits from using CloudFront rather than Akamai. CloudFront seems to be better documented too and their API is easily accessible whereas Akamai isn't. I'm hoping to get pros and cons between choosing Akamai vs. CloudFront. Thanks in advance!
295
As you can see, Akamai and AWS CloudFront are both powerful content delivery networks that offer a wide range of professional features for delivering data over the internet. While they are equally powerful, these platforms have different strengths that make each better suited for a different use case.
A new report from Informa Telecoms & Media finds that pure-play Content Delivery Network (CDN) Akamai remains the largest of the traditional CDNs, both in terms of revenues and number of network servers, but adds that it faces growing competition, specialisation and consolidation threats.
Akamai is the global leader in Content Delivery Network (CDN) services, making the Internet fast, reliable and secure for its customers. AWS Partner Website.
Akamai is one of the world's leading Content Delivery Network (CDN) providers. Through the Akamai Intelligent Platform many products are offered to aid performance, availability, security, and insight generation. Other CDNs include Cloudflare, Fastly, MaxCDN, Incapsula, and Rackspace.
Each service is performing differently in different regions. Amazon CloudFront can be better in the APAC region, while Akamai might be better in South of Europe and the Middle east.
Since this is a physical service that depends on the actual location of their PoP (Point of Presence) servers, you need to measure where most of your users are, and choose the better service for that region.
You can see such a comparison about the CDN performance in different regions here: http://media.amazonwebservices.com/FS_WP_AWS_CDN_CloudFront.pdf
The main difference between CloudFront and Akamai is the number of PoP servers. CloudFront is using Super PoP approach, which means much fewer (edge) locations (54 as of January 2016 - see complete list here), compared to the thousands that Akamai has around the world. This is why CloudFront costs less than Akamai.
Having more PoP was crucial in the early days of the Internet. But as the Internet is developing around the world the difference in performance is shrinking.
There are even benefits for "Super PoP" in terms of cache, as there is a better chance of finding an element in the cache if you have fewer cache servers.
If you are hosting your web servers in EC2, you will probably get better performance and surely better pricing from CloudFront. If not, you should check the performance and pricing between the various providers.
Note that you don't have to be exclusive, as many big content providers are using several CDN and not a single one.
168
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
