I have seen an example of AggregateException
on the web and I'm trying to figure out how it works. I have written a simple example, but my code for some reason doesn't work.
Could someone explain to me what the problem is?
public static void Main()
{
try
{
Parallel.For(0, 500000, i =>
{
if (i == 10523)
throw new TimeoutException("i = 10523");
Console.WriteLine(i + "\n");
});
}
catch (AggregateException exception)
{
foreach (Exception ex in exception.InnerExceptions)
{
Console.WriteLine(ex.ToString());
}
}
}
AggregateException is used to consolidate multiple failures into a single, throwable exception object. It is used extensively in the Task Parallel Library (TPL) and Parallel LINQ (PLINQ). For more information, see Exception Handling and How to: Handle Exceptions in a PLINQ Query.
Turn on Break on All Exceptions (Debug, Exceptions) and rerun the program. This will show you the original exception when it was thrown in the first place. (comment appended): In VS2015 (or above). Select Debug > Options > Debugging > General and unselect the "Enable Just My Code" option.
You can also use the AggregateException. Flatten method to rethrow the inner exceptions from multiple AggregateException instances thrown by multiple tasks in a single AggregateException instance, as the following example shows. C# Copy. using System; using System.
When using await, it's going to unwrap the first exception and return it, that's why we don't hit the catch (AggregateException e) line. But if we use something like the below code sample, we catch the AggregateException , note that it's not a good idea since we're blocking the running thread.
You need to call Handle
on the inner exceptions. From MSDN's documentation on Handle
:
Each invocation of the predicate returns true or false to indicate whether the Exception was handled. After all invocations, if any exceptions went unhandled, all unhandled exceptions will be put into a new AggregateException which will be thrown. Otherwise, the Handle method simply returns. If any invocations of the predicate throws an exception, it will halt the processing of any more exceptions and immediately propagate the thrown exception as-is.
The example code, also from MSDN:
public static void Main()
{
var task1 = Task.Run(() => { throw new CustomException("This exception is expected!"); });
try
{
task1.Wait();
}
catch (AggregateException ae)
{
// Call the Handle method to handle the custom exception,
// otherwise rethrow the exception.
ae.Handle(ex =>
{
if (ex is CustomException)
Console.WriteLine(ex.Message);
return ex is CustomException;
});
}
}
When using Parallel the "job" (here counting from 0 to 500000) gets split onto several worker threads. Each of these could throw an exception. In the sample the exception is coded to happen in the thread working on 10523. In a real world scenario more than one exception could happen (in different threads) - the AggregateException is just a "container" for all exceptions occuring while Parallel is running so that you don't lose any exception...
AggregateException
is often used for catching exceptions, that might occur when waiting for a Task
to complete. Because Task
in general can consist of multiple others, we do not know, whether there will be one or more exceptions thrown.
Check the following example:
// set up your task
Action<int> job = (int i) =>
{
if (i % 100 == 0)
throw new TimeoutException("i = " + i);
};
// we want many tasks to run in paralell
var tasks = new Task[1000];
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
{
// assign to other variable,
// or it will use the same number for every task
var j = i;
// run your task
var task = Task.Run(() => job(j));
// save it
tasks[i] = task;
}
try
{
// wait for all the tasks to finish in a blocking manner
Task.WaitAll(tasks);
}
catch (AggregateException e)
{
// catch whatever was thrown
foreach (Exception ex in e.InnerExceptions)
Console.WriteLine(ex.Message);
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With