I want to add an aggregate, grouped, nunique column to my pandas dataframe but not aggregate the entire dataframe. I'm trying to do this in one line and avoid creating a new aggregated object and merging that, etc.
my df has track, type, and id. I want the number of unique ids for each track/type combination as a new column in the table (but not collapse track/type combos in the resulting df). Same number of rows, 1 more column.
something like this isn't working:
df['n_unique_id'] = df.groupby(['track', 'type'])['id'].nunique()
nor is
df['n_unique_id'] = df.groupby(['track', 'type'])['id'].transform(nunique)
this last one works with some aggregating functions but not others. the following works (but is meaningless on my dataset):
df['n_unique_id'] = df.groupby(['track', 'type'])['id'].transform(sum)
in R this is easily done in data.table with
df[, n_unique_id := uniqueN(id), by = c('track', 'type')]
thanks!
Using apply() method If you need to apply a method over an existing column in order to compute some values that will eventually be added as a new column in the existing DataFrame, then pandas. DataFrame. apply() method should do the trick.
To apply aggregations to multiple columns, just add additional key:value pairs to the dictionary. Applying multiple aggregation functions to a single column will result in a multiindex. Working with multi-indexed columns is a pain and I'd recommend flattening this after aggregating by renaming the new columns.
groupby() can take the list of columns to group by multiple columns and use the aggregate functions to apply single or multiple aggregations at the same time.
What is the GroupBy function? Pandas' GroupBy is a powerful and versatile function in Python. It allows you to split your data into separate groups to perform computations for better analysis.
df.groupby(['track', 'type'])['id'].transform(nunique)
Implies that there is a name nunique
in the name space that performs some function. transform
will take a function or a string that it knows a function for. nunique
is definitely one of those strings.
As pointed out by @root, often the method that pandas
will utilize to perform a transformation indicated by these strings are optimized and should generally be preferred to passing your own functions. This is True
even for passing numpy
functions in some cases.
For example transform('sum')
should be preferred over transform(sum)
.
Try this instead
df.groupby(['track', 'type'])['id'].transform('nunique')
demo
df = pd.DataFrame(dict(
track=list('11112222'), type=list('AAAABBBB'), id=list('XXYZWWWW')))
print(df)
id track type
0 X 1 A
1 X 1 A
2 Y 1 A
3 Z 1 A
4 W 2 B
5 W 2 B
6 W 2 B
7 W 2 B
df.groupby(['track', 'type'])['id'].transform('nunique')
0 3
1 3
2 3
3 3
4 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
Name: id, dtype: int64
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With