I compiled the code below on gcc(x64).
Why can I access the structure items by putting dot(people[0].name) rather than '->'?
Isn't people[0] is pointing to the address of the structure and I should use people[0]->name or (*people[0]).name to access the name?
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
#define TOTAL 4
int main(void) {
typedef struct tagPerson {
char name[12];
int ID;
} Person;
#define LPPERSON Person*
Person * people = calloc(sizeof(Person), TOTAL);
strncpy(people[0].name, "Henry", 12);
strncpy(people[1].name, "Jacob", 12);
printf("sizeof(people)=%d\n", sizeof(people));
printf("people[0].name=%s\n", people[0].name);
printf("sizeof(people[0])=%d\n", sizeof(people[0]));
printf("people[1].name=%s\n", people[1].name);
printf("sizeof(people[1])=%d\n", sizeof(people[1]));
free(people);
return 0;
}
Output:
sizeof(people)=8
people[0].name=Henry
sizeof(people[0])=16
people[1].name=Jacob
sizeof(people[1])=16
people is a pointer to Person. E1[E2] is an array subscript operation, that is equal to *((E1) + (E2)) (6.5.2.1). Here E1 must be pointer to T and E2 must be of an integer type. Type of whole expression is simply T. In your case E1 is a pointer to Person, so people[0] has type of Person, and access to fields is performed via . instead of ->.
If you want to use arrow - you can do it in next way:
(people + 1)->name; /* the same as people[1].name */
Person * people means that:
data type of people is Person *, i.e. pointer to Person.
and;
datatype of *people is Person, i.e. a Person data type. And similary, datatype of *(people + index) is also a Person.
And because, people[index] is internally converted into *(people + index), the datatype of people[index] is Person- and NOT apointer to Person.
Since people[index] is of datatype Person, and not a pointer to Person, you access its members using the . operator, and NOT the -> operator.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With