Recently I was reading about monkey patching technique and wondered if it can be said.
Decorator = a function that takes a function as an argument and returns a function
Monkey patching = replacing a value of a field on an object with a different value (not necessarly functions)
In case of functions monkey patching can be performed via a decorator. So I guess decorator might be thought as an example of monkey patching. However commonly monkey patching refers to altering behaviour of a 3rd party library. In that case decorators are less useful.
I suppose on some grammatical level they may be equivalent. However, decorators are applied at the time a function or class is defined, and monkeypatching modifies an object at runtime, making them very different both in spirit and in actual use.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With