I was writing some code and came across a incompatible types compilation error.
This is what I have:
public interface Expression<T> {
int getArity();
T evaluate();
}
public abstract class Value<T> implements Expression<T> {
@Override
public final int getArity() { return 0; }
}
public final class Constant<T> extends Value<T> {
private final T value;
/** Parameter constructor of objects of class Constant. */
public Constant(T val) {
value = val;
}
/** Copy constructor of objects of class Constant. */
private Constant(Constant instance) {
value = instance.evaluate(); // Error here.
}
@Override
public T evaluate() { return value; }
}
I thought I wasn't declaring generics correctly when using inheritance, so I checked Oracle's tutorial, in which they write
interface PayloadList<E,P> extends List<E>
The above declaration uses the same generic type E, which is what I want to accomplish in my example. It seems to be assuming that the T from Constant<T> is different from the one from Value<T>. Otherwise it should be able to merge both T and see it's the same type.
How can I correctly implement what I'm trying to achieve?
(Ie, a constant of something is a value of something, which is an expression of the same something)
Your instance variable is defined as Constant instance;
If you don't specify your generic on your variable, the generic type will automatically be Object, and the type Object is different from T.
You have to use
private Constant(Constant<T> instance)
instead of
private Constant(Constant instance)
because this would be the same as private Constant(Constant<Object> instance)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With