I am wondering why this situation is not resulting in an ambiguous reference between types, one a class within our library and one an external struct. Consider the following-
External struct-
namespace External.Models
{
public struct ProxyUser
{
public string Username { get; set; }
public string Password { get; set; }
}
}
Our class-
namespace MyApp.Configuration
{
public class ProxyUser
{
public string Username { get; set; }
public string Password { get; set; }
}
}
Then the calling code approximates-
using External.Models;
namespace MyApp.Configuration.Factories
{
sealed class Factory
{
public async Task<T> BuildConfiguration<T>()
{
var proxy = new ProxyUser { Username = username, Password = password }; // I would expect this to be ambiguous, but it references out class
}
}
}
This is a NetStandard 2.0 library if that makes a difference. Behavior is the same if I make our class a struct. Why isn't this ambiguous?
EDIT - Class is sealed, again if that makes a difference...
ANSWER
As @Sinatr mentioned, it appears to be related to this question- https://stackoverflow.com/a/25437586/14872099
This is a demonstration of the different behaviors I observed.
This resolves to our MyApp.Configuration.ProxyUser-
using External.Models;
namespace MyApp.Configuration.Factories
{
sealed class Factory
{
public async Task<T> BuildConfiguration<T>()
{
var proxy = new ProxyUser { Username = username, Password = password }; // resolves to our class
}
}
}
This resolves to the external struct-
namespace MyApp.Configuration.Factories
{
using External.Models;
sealed class Factory
{
public async Task<T> BuildConfiguration<T>()
{
var proxy = new ProxyUser { Username = username, Password = password }; // resolves to external struct
}
}
}
Moving our class to another namespace creates ambiguity-
using External.Models;
using MyApp.Configuration.Models; // moved our class to this namespace
namespace MyApp.Configuration.Factories
{
sealed class Factory
{
public async Task<T> BuildConfiguration<T>()
{
var proxy = new ProxyUser { Username = username, Password = password }; // this is ambiguous
}
}
}
Internal namespaces (i.e. inside the namespace brackets) get priority over external namespaces (i.e. using statements before the namespace block).
Note: "internal" and "external" aren't official definitions here, I just use these to easily distinguish between them.
Due to nesting, your namespace MyApp.Configuration.Factories block inherently also looks at any direct ancestors (MyApp.Configuration and MyApp), but not sibling namespaces (e.g. MyApp.Configuration.Services).
When a non-ambiguous reference is found in the internal namespaces, the system never bothers to check the external namespaces, and thus does not find a conflict. You'd only encounter a conflict if:
MyApp.Configuration.ProxyUser and MyApp.Configuration.Factories.ProxyUserExternal.Models.ProxyUser and Another.Namespace.ProxyUser (assuming both are referenced with using statements in this file)If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With