Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Why do we not use const more often?

Tags:

c

constants

It is common to see the keyword const with pointers :

void function(const char *string)
{
    const char *other_string = "some string";
}

But why do not we use const every time we declare a variable that we will not change ? It is rare to see :

void function(const int i)
{
    const double j = 1.2;
    // i and j will not be changed in this function
}

I am trying to understand why we do not use const more often, is it always a good thing to use it when we can, or not ? This post seems to answer YES, but in reality this doest not seem to be the case ...

like image 268
Gam Avatar asked Nov 01 '25 11:11

Gam


2 Answers

In most cases it no longer makes a difference.

Often enough the compiler will be able to deduce that the variable is actually read only, and treat it as a constant during optimization.

Either way, you usually use const consequently on things like const char *string in order to avoid accidentally modifying the parameter.

Since all parameters are passed by value, this isn't something which can't happen for an integer. Only for pointers the pointer itself is the value.

Actually, const char *string isn't fully constant either yet. Only the chars the pointer is pointing to is, but the pointer as a variable isn't. It would only become when specifying it as const char * const string. Now the string variable is completely constant for the scope of the function.

like image 93
Ext3h Avatar answered Nov 04 '25 01:11

Ext3h


In the case you give, I would always say

void function(const int i)

in a situation where the role of i is to parameterise the behaviour of the function -- which is almost always. If I change i in the body of the function, I have either made an error, or written something which another person will find hard to understand later.

Intentionally modifying the value of i in the function isn't as "dangerous" as modifying a entity through its pointer -- it won't create side-effects outside the function. I guess that's why most developers don't feel the pressure to define primitive paramters as const. I maintain, however, that it is a sensible thing to do, if one cares about long-term maintenance.

like image 41
Kevin Boone Avatar answered Nov 04 '25 01:11

Kevin Boone



Donate For Us

If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!