I am using functions that accept a range by iterators, something similar to "printPoints" and "printPoints2" in following code. So far, "printPoints" can accept iterators of vector/list/etc of Point objects, but "printPoints2" is needed to handle vector/list/etc of POINTERs to Point objects. Is there any trick to write a more versatile function to replace those two?
Thanks in advance.
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <list>
#include <iterator>
#include <memory>
struct Point {
int x;
int y;
Point(int x, int y): x(x), y(y) {}
};
/*
Is there a more versatile function to replace the following two?
*/
template <class Iter>
void printPoints(Iter begin, Iter end) {
for(auto it=begin; it!=end; ++it)
std::cout << "{" << it->x << " " << it->y << "}";
}
template <class Iter>
void printPoints2(Iter begin, Iter end) {
for(auto it=begin; it!=end; ++it)
std::cout << "{" << (*it)->x << " " << (*it)->y << "}";
}
int main()
{
std::vector<Point> vecPoints = {{0,0}, {1,1}};
std::cout << "vector of points: ";
printPoints(vecPoints.begin(), vecPoints.end());
std::cout << "\n";
std::list<Point> listPoints = {{2,2}, {3,3}};
std::cout << "list of points: ";
printPoints(listPoints.begin(), listPoints.end());
std::cout << "\n";
std::vector<std::unique_ptr<Point>> vecPtrPoints;
vecPtrPoints.push_back(std::make_unique<Point>(4,4));
vecPtrPoints.push_back(std::make_unique<Point>(5,5));
std::cout << "vector of pointers to point: ";
// won't work because of "it->x" inside the function
//printPoints(vecPtrPoints.begin(), vecPtrPoints.end());
printPoints2(vecPtrPoints.begin(), vecPtrPoints.end());
std::cout << "\n";
}
C++17 to the rescue!
#include <type_traits>
template <class Iter>
void printPoints(Iter begin, Iter end) {
for(auto it=begin; it!=end; ++it)
{
if constexpr (std::is_same_v<typename std::iterator_traits<Iter>::value_type, Point>)
{
std::cout << "{" << it->x << " " << it->y << "}";
}
else
{
std::cout << "{" << (*it)->x << " " << (*it)->y << "}";
}
}
}
If you don't have c++17 then you can achieve something similar by using std::enable_if to allow you to have both of your printPoints functions to with the same name.
Another approach would be to refactor your code:
void printPoint(const Point& point)
{
std::cout << "{" << point.x << " " << point.y << "}";
}
void printPoint(const std::unique_ptr<Point>& point)
{
printPoint(*point);
}
template <class Iter>
void printPoints(Iter begin, Iter end) {
for(auto it=begin; it!=end; ++it)
{
printPoint(*it);
}
}
This is a little more verbose but will work in earlier c++ standards and might be easier to understand for novice c++ programmers.
Option 3 is a combination of both:
void printPoint(const Point& point)
{
std::cout << "{" << point.x << " " << point.y << "}";
}
template <class Iter>
void printPoints(Iter begin, Iter end) {
for(auto it=begin; it!=end; ++it)
{
if constexpr (std::is_same_v<typename std::iterator_traits<Iter>::value_type, Point>)
{
printPoint(*it);
}
else
{
printPoint(**it);
}
}
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With