I am puzzled with the following error in python 2.7.12 Suppose we have a class definition within a class, something similar to this:
class C(object):
def __init__(self):
print "class C"
class D(object):
def __init__(self):
print "class D"
class A(D):
class B(C):
def __init__(self):
# Strangely here B is "not defined", why?
super(B, self).__init__()
print "class B"
def __init__(self):
super(D, self).__init__()
print "class A"
def do_something(self):
b_class = self.B()
print "b_class within A : {}".format(b_class)
a_class = A()
a_class.do_something()
but if we we extract the definition of class B outside the scope of class A,
everything works well.
Do we need to use "super" differently when called within a nested class? I fail to understand why its usage would be different within or outside the nested class. Any pointers?
The problem is not the subclass or superclass, but the nesting. B itself is not defined, only A.B is.
Note that in Python there is almost never a good reason to nest classes, though.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With