I have a Result<'T, 'E> list that I would like to turn into a single Result<'T list, 'E> following these rules:
Result is an Error then the result should be an Error
Error it should be the first Error in the listOK then the result should be an Ok and the list order should be maintainedSo I had a go and implemented this as follows:
let all xs =
let folder = fun state next ->
match (state, next) with
| (Result.Ok ys, Result.Ok y) -> ys |> List.append [ y ] |> Result.Ok
| (Result.Error e, _) -> Result.Error e
| (_, Result.Error e) -> Result.Error e
Seq.fold folder (Result.Ok []) xs
However, this seems like something that might already have been implemented in the standard library. Has it?
Second, I have a computation expression for Result like this:
type ResultBuilder () =
member this.Bind(x, f) =
match x with
| Result.Ok o -> f o
| Result.Error e -> Result.Error e
member this.Return(value) = Result.Ok value
member this.ReturnFrom(value) = value
let result = new ResultBuilder()
I can use all inside of a result { ... } but is further integration possible? For example by implementing ResultBuilder.For?
This functionality is provided by the FsToolkit.ErrorHandling package. The function List.sequenceResultM will return either:
Result.Ok containing a list of all Ok valuesResult.Error containing just the first Error valueThere is also a variant List.sequenceResultA that returns a list of all errors found.
#r "nuget: FsToolkit.ErrorHandling, 2.0.0"
open FsToolkit.ErrorHandling
let xs : Result<int, string> list =
[
Ok 123
Ok 456
]
let xa = List.sequenceResultA xs // Ok [123; 456]
let xm = List.sequenceResultM xs // Ok [123; 456]
printfn "xa: %A" xa
printfn "xm: %A" xm
let ys =
[
Ok 123
Ok 456
Error "abc"
Ok 789
]
let ya = List.sequenceResultA ys // Error ["abc"]
let ym = List.sequenceResultM ys // Error "abc"
printfn "ya: %A" ya
printfn "ym: %A" ym
let zs =
[
Ok 123
Error "abc"
Error "def"
Ok 456
]
let za = List.sequenceResultA zs // Error ["abc"; "def"]
let zm = List.sequenceResultM zs // Error "abc"
printfn "za: %A" za
printfn "zm: %A" zm
xa: Ok [123; 456]
xm: Ok [123; 456]
ya: Error ["abc"]
ym: Error "abc"
za: Error ["abc"; "def"]
zm: Error "abc"
In terms of computation expressions (also provided by FsToolkit.ErrorHandling), you could do:
#r "nuget: FsToolkit.ErrorHandling, 2.0.0"
open FsToolkit.ErrorHandling
let printAll xs =
result {
let! xs = List.sequenceResultA xs
for x in xs do
printfn "%A" x
}
(Noting that other answers here more than suffice!)
If working specifically with Lists, this can be done using the sequence function (Result<'c, 'd> list -> Result<'c list, 'd>) exposed by the Result module of the Fsharpx.Extras library (source code).
However, for more general sequences, this can be done with Seq.sequenceResultM function provided by the FsToolkit.ErrorHandling library.
You have a Result<'a, 'e> list and want a Result<'a list, 'e>. That sounds like the sequence function described in https://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/posts/elevated-world-4/ (which has nothing to do with seqs, despite what the name sounds like). A quick check of https://github.com/fsharp/fsharp/blob/master/src/fsharp/FSharp.Core/result.fs suggests that this function hasn't been implemented in the standard FSharp.Core library, so you'll need to implement it yourself.
BTW, if you haven't already read Scott Wlaschin's "Elevated World" series, I don't recommend starting in the middle with the article I linked. Start with this article instead, as it builds the background knowledge you need to understand what the "traverse" and "sequence" functions do. Then you'll know the general pattern for implementing one of those functions.
As for your second question, could you provide a few more specifics? For example, what behavior do you want out of ResultBuilder.For? The normal behavior expected of a for expression would be to take a Result<'a, 'e> list (or seq or array) and run the inner block once for every Result<'a, 'e> that's in the list or seq or array. If you tried to use your all function here, you'd have a type mismatch between Result<'a, 'e> (which is what F# would expect a CE's .For method to produce) and Result<'a list, 'e> which is what your all method is returning. What specifically do you want your ResultBuilder.For method to do?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With