After revising, we concluded that the time complexity is actually O(2^n)
The question is what is the time complexity? Is it O(2^n) or?
The reason I believe this is because of the for loop is considered to be runned n time. Then the nested while loop is runs 2^n time. The second while loop runs 2^n time.
Algorithm subsetsGenerator(T)
Input: A set T of n elements
Output: All the subsets of T stored in a queue Q {
create an empty queue Q;
create an empty stack S;
let a1, a2, …, an be all the elements in T;
S.push({}); // Push the empty subset into the stack
S.push({a1})
for ( each element ai in T-{a1} )
{
while (S is not empty )
{
x=S.pop;
Q.enqueue(x);
x=x ∪ { ai };
Q.enqueue(x);
}
if ( ai is not the last element )
while (Q is not empty )
{
x=Q.dequeue();
S.push(x);
}
}
}
Edit: If you want me to break down the analysis, comment bellow.
Big O notation is used to describe the complexity of an algorithm when measuring its efficiency, which in this case means how well the algorithm scales with the size of the dataset.
In general, you can determine the time complexity by analyzing the program's statements (go line by line). However, you have to be mindful how are the statements arranged. Suppose they are inside a loop or have function calls or even recursion. All these factors affect the runtime of your code.
The Big O Notation for time complexity gives a rough idea of how long it will take an algorithm to execute based on two things: the size of the input it has and the amount of steps it takes to complete. We compare the two to get our runtime.
For your set T of n elements, the total number of subsets is 2^n. If you want to keep all those subsets in Q, the time complexity is at least O(2^n).
Actually I think O(2^n) is the answer.
If I understand your algorithm correctly, you are trying to do for each element a_i in T, take out everything in S, put it back into S twice - once without a_i and once with a_i.
Hence the total time complexity is (1+2+4+...+2^n) times C, C stands for the time to pop, enqueue, dequeue, and push, which is O(1). The term above equals 2^(n+1)-1 which is still O(2^n).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With