I found there're two different opinions about how greedy regex is executed:
Greedy quantifiers are considered "greedy" because they force the matcher to read in, or eat, the entire input string prior to attempting the first match. If the first match attempt (the entire input string) fails, the matcher backs off the input string by one character and tries again, repeating the process until a match is found or there are no more characters left to back off from.
also see this article: Performance of Greedy vs. Lazy Regex Quantifiers
Repetition with Star and Plus the Looking Inside The Regex Engine section talk about <.+>:
The first token in the regex is <. This is a literal. As we already know, the first place where it will match is the first < in the string.
I want to know which one is correct? This matters because it will affect the efficiency of regex. I added various language tags, because I want to know if it's implemented differently in each language.
Assuming they're functionally equivalent (and based on my Java regex use, they are), it's just a difference in engine implementation. Regular Expressions are not implemented exactly the same way in all languages, and can be more or less powerful based on which language you use.
The second link describes Perl, so I'd trust Oracle on the Java side of things.
Both attempt to get the largest match possible.
Making a quantifier lazy by adding the ? key will attempt the smallest match possible.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With