Consider the following:
class (a ~ b) => Equal a b
instance (a ~ b) => Equal a b
Lets say I later have a data type:
data D (c :: * -> Constraint) where
D :: Proxy c -> D c
Then something like this is valid:
D (Proxy :: (Proxy (Equal Int)))
My question is, is there any way to write Equal other than the repetitive class/instance notation I've used?
It seems that when I define Equal as a type family Equal Int doesn't work because it's an incomplete application.
The class/instance hack looks bad but at least it works, but is there any other maybe cleaner way of achieving this?
Note I'll be using constraints more complex than equality in my actual code, I just thought this would be a good example.
You do not need a class at all, you can just use (~) in prefix notation.
There is a bug in GHC 8.0.1 which sometimes makes it crash, but it is just a bug, and it's fixed in 8.0.2. The class / instance combo you're describing is indeed an effective workaround for this bug.
If you do not need backwards compatibility with 8.0.1, you can use (~) Int or Proxy ((~) Int) directly.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With