I am wondering if the C++ standard guarantees that multidimensional arrays (not dynamically allocated) are flattened into a 1D array of exactly the same space. For example, if I have
char x[100];
char y[10][10];
Would these both be equivalent? I'm aware that most compilers would flatten y, but is this actually guaranteed to happen? Reading section 11.3.4 Arrays of the C++ Standard, I cannot actually find anywhere that guarantees this.
The C++ standard guarantees that y[i] follows immediately after y[i-1]. Since y[i-1] is 10 characters long, then, logically speaking, y[i] should take place 10 characters later in memory; however, could a compiler pad y[i-1] with extra characters to keep y[i] aligned?
What you are looking for is found in [dcl.array]/6
An object of type “array of N U” contains a contiguously allocated non-empty set of N subobjects of type U, known as the elements of the array, and numbered 0 to N-1.
What this states is that if you have an array like int arr[10] then to have 10 int's that are contiguous in memory. This definition works recursively though so if you have
int arr[5][10]
then what you have is an array of 5 int[10] arrays. If we apply the definition from above then we know that the 5 int[10] arrays are contiguous and then int[10]'s themselves are contiguous so all 50 int's are contiguous. So yes, a 2d array look just like a 1d array in memory since really that is what they are.
This does not mean you can get a pointer to arr[0][0] and iterate to arr[4][9] with it. Per [expr.add]/4
When an expression J that has integral type is added to or subtracted from an expression P of pointer type, the result has the type of P.
If P evaluates to a null pointer value and J evaluates to 0, the result is a null pointer value.
Otherwise, if P points to an array element i of an array object x with n elements ([dcl.array]), the expressions P + J and J + P (where J has the value j) point to the (possibly-hypothetical) array element i+j of x if 0≤i+j≤n and the expression P - J points to the (possibly-hypothetical) array element i−j of x if 0≤i−j≤n.
Otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
What this states is that if you have a pointer to an array, then the valid indices you can add to it are [0, array_size]. So if you did
int * it = &arr[0][0]
then what it points to is the first element of the first array which means you can legally only increment it to it + 10 since that is the past then end element of the first array. Going into the second array is UB even though they are contiguous.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With