I have rarely seen static_cast between top level const so far.
Recently I had to use static_cast to display address of a pointer to const object and I come out with this question:
Is it allowed to static_cast between different types of const?
It passed compilation using gcc 4.7. But I am just asking here to confirm it is not UB. Thanks.
const int a = 42; // test case 1, const obj
const double b = static_cast<const double>(a);
cout << b << endl;
const int c = 0; // test case 2, pointer to const obj
cout << static_cast<const void*>(&c) << endl;
From [expr.static.cast]
[...] The static_cast operator shall not cast away constness
It's perfectly fine to add const using static_cast, then again you don't need to in your test case
const int a = 42; // test case 1, const obj
const double b = static_cast<double>(a); // Works just as well.
const double b = a; // Of course this is fine too
I suppose one of the few times you'd want to add const with static_cast would be to explicitly call an overloaded function
void foo(int*) { }
void foo(int const*) { }
int main()
{
int a = 42;
foo(&a);
foo(static_cast<int const*>(&a));
}
Although with properly designed code you shouldn't really need to do this.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With