I am trying to use C++ concepts in order to write a type trait that will produce a different type depending on whether its template argument is a fundamental type or not:
template<typename T>
concept fundamental = std::is_fundamental_v<T>;
template<typename T>
concept non_fundamental = !std::is_fundamental_v<T>;
The following code works just as expected:
void Print(fundamental auto value)
{
std::cout << "fundamental\n";
}
void Print(non_fundamental auto value)
{
std::cout << "non fundamental\n";
}
int main()
{
Print(1); // prints "fundamental"
Print(std::string("str")); // prints "non fundamental"
}
Applying the same idea on type traits doesn't work.
template<fundamental T>
struct SomeTypeTrait
{
using type = T;
};
template<non_fundamental T>
struct SomeTypeTrait
{
using type = std::shared_ptr<T>;
};
using ExpectedToBeDouble = SomeTypeTrait<double>::type;
using ExpectedToBeSharedPtrOfString = SomeTypeTrait<std::string>::type; // fails to compile
I get a compiler error (MSVC) saying:
error C3855: 'SomeTypeTrait': template parameter 'T' is incompatible with the declaration
How can I achieve the desired behavior using concepts?
Apparently the syntax is slightly different from what I had in mind.
Here is a working solution:
template<typename T>
struct SomeTypeTrait {};
template<fundamental T>
struct SomeTypeTrait<T> // note the extra <T>
{
using type = T;
};
template<non_fundamental T>
struct SomeTypeTrait<T> // note the extra <T>
{
using type = std::shared_ptr<T>;
};
Also, one of the specializations could become the default implementation to make the code a bit shorter and allows for more specializations to be added later:
template<typename T>
struct SomeTypeTrait // default
{
using type = std::shared_ptr<T>;
};
template<fundamental T>
struct SomeTypeTrait<T> // specialization for fundamental types
{
using type = T;
};
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With