Searching up the above shows many results about how to set breakpoints for apps running in docker containers, yet I'm interested in setting a breakpoint in the Dockerfile itself, such that the docker build is paused at the breakpoint. For an example Dockerfile:
FROM ubuntu:20.04
RUN echo "hello"
RUN echo "bye"
I'm looking for a way to set a breakpoint on the RUN echo "bye" such that when I debug this Dockerfile, the image will build non-interactively up to the RUN echo "bye" point, exclusive. After then, I would be able to interactively run commands with the container. In the actual Dockerfile I have, there are RUNs before the breakpoint that change the file system of the image being built, and I want to analyze the filesystem of the image at the breakpoint by being able to interactively run commands like cd / ls / find at the time of the breakpoint.
You can't set a breakpoint per se, but you can get an interactive shell at an arbitrary point in your build sequence (between steps).
Let's build your image:
Sending build context to Docker daemon 2.048kB
Step 1/3 : FROM ubuntu:20.04
---> 1e4467b07108
Step 2/3 : RUN echo "hello"
---> Running in 917b34190e35
hello
Removing intermediate container 917b34190e35
---> 12ebbdc1e72d
Step 3/3 : RUN echo "bye"
---> Running in c2a4a71ae444
bye
Removing intermediate container c2a4a71ae444
---> 3c52993b0185
Successfully built 3c52993b0185
Each of the lines that says ---> 0123456789ab with a hex ID has a valid image ID. So from here you can
docker run --rm -it 12ebbdc1e72d sh
which will give you an interactive shell on the partial image resulting from the first RUN command.
There's no requirement that the build as a whole succeed. If a RUN step fails, you can use this technique to get an interactive shell on the image immediately before that step and re-run the command by hand. If you have a very long RUN command, you may need to break it into two to be able to get a debugging shell at a specific point within the command sequence.
I don't think this is possible directly - that feature has been discussed and rejected.
What I generally do to debug a Dockerfile is to comment all of the steps after the "breakpoint", then run docker build followed by docker run -it image bash or docker run -it image sh (depending on whether you have bash installed inside the container).
Then, I have an interactive shell, and I can run commands to debug why later stages are failing.
I agree that being able to set a breakpoint and poke around would be a handy feature, though.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With