Lets assume we have defined two Lambdas.
Func<TInput, TOutput> a = …;
Func<TInput1, TInput2, TOutput> b = …;
Now lets assume that we have some code that does not work with generics and receives these Lambdas as not further typed delegates.
delegate da = a;
delegate db = b;
In that code, we want to compose the two lambdas / delegates to a new, composed lambda e.g. (i1, i2) => b(a(i1), i2), but a and b are not accessible, only da and db are accessible. How can this be done in an elegant way?
Does this what you want?:
Func<int, int> a = p0 => p0 << 1;
Func<int, int, int> b = (p0, p1) => p0 + p1;
Delegate da = a;
Delegate db = b;
var inner = da.Method.GetParameters().Length < db.Method.GetParameters().Length ? da : db;
var outer = inner == da ? db : da;
Func<int, int, int> c = (i1, i2) => (int)outer.DynamicInvoke(inner.DynamicInvoke(i1), i2);
I would prefer to create an expression tree to build a new lambda that's created as you want. Maybe there is more logic needed to determine which argument should be passed to a and at which parameter the result of a is passed to b.
Is that the way you want to go?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With