Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How do I redirect stdin/stdout when I have a sequence of commands in Bash?

I've currently got a Bash command being executed (via Python's subprocess.Popen) which is reading from stdin, doing something and outputing to stdout. Something along the lines of:

pid = subprocess.Popen( ["-c", "cmd1 | cmd2"],
                       stdin = subprocess.PIPE, 
                       stdout = subprocess.PIPE, 
                       shell =True )
output_data = pid.communicate( "input data\n" )

Now, what I want to do is to change that to execute another command in that same subshell that will alter the state before the next commands execute, so my shell command line will now (conceptually) be:

cmd0; cmd1 | cmd2

Is there any way to have the input sent to cmd1 instead of cmd0 in this scenario? I'm assuming the output will include cmd0's output (which will be empty) followed by cmd2's output.

cmd0 shouldn't actually read anything from stdin, does that make a difference in this situation?

I know this is probably just a dumb way of doing this, I'm trying to patch in cmd0 without altering the other code too significantly. That said, I'm open to suggestions if there's a much cleaner way to approach this.

like image 691
Tom Avatar asked Oct 20 '25 16:10

Tom


2 Answers

execute cmd0 and cmd1 in a subshell and redirect /dev/null as stdin for cmd0:

(cmd0 </dev/null; cmd1) | cmd2
like image 178
Jürgen Hötzel Avatar answered Oct 23 '25 07:10

Jürgen Hötzel


I don't think you should have to do anything special. If cmd0 doesn't touch stdin, it'll be intact for cmd1. Try for yourself:

ls | ( echo "foo"; sed 's/^/input: /')

(Using ls as an arbitrary command to produce a few lines of input for the pipeline)

And the additional pipe to cmd2 doesn't affect the input either, of course.

like image 44
Cascabel Avatar answered Oct 23 '25 07:10

Cascabel