Distinguish empty Stream, Stream of empty Optionals only, Stream with at least one non-empty Optional [duplicate]

Question

How can I check if a Stream is empty and throw an exception if it's not, as a non-terminal operation?

Basically, I'm looking for something equivalent to the code below, but without materializing the stream in-between. In particular, the check should not occur before the stream is actually consumed by a terminal operation.

public Stream<Thing> getFilteredThings() {
    Stream<Thing> stream = getThings().stream()
                .filter(Thing::isFoo)
                .filter(Thing::isBar);
    return nonEmptyStream(stream, () -> {
        throw new RuntimeException("No foo bar things available")   
    });
}

private static <T> Stream<T> nonEmptyStream(Stream<T> stream, Supplier<T> defaultValue) {
    List<T> list = stream.collect(Collectors.toList());
    if (list.isEmpty()) list.add(defaultValue.get());
    return list.stream();
}

Answer 1

This may be sufficient in many cases

stream.findAny().isPresent()

Answer 2

The other answers and comments are correct in that to examine the contents of a stream, one must add a terminal operation, thereby "consuming" the stream. However, one can do this and turn the result back into a stream, without buffering up the entire contents of the stream. Here are a couple examples:

static <T> Stream<T> throwIfEmpty(Stream<T> stream) {
    Iterator<T> iterator = stream.iterator();
    if (iterator.hasNext()) {
        return StreamSupport.stream(Spliterators.spliteratorUnknownSize(iterator, 0), false);
    } else {
        throw new NoSuchElementException("empty stream");
    }
}

static <T> Stream<T> defaultIfEmpty(Stream<T> stream, Supplier<T> supplier) {
    Iterator<T> iterator = stream.iterator();
    if (iterator.hasNext()) {
        return StreamSupport.stream(Spliterators.spliteratorUnknownSize(iterator, 0), false);
    } else {
        return Stream.of(supplier.get());
    }
}

Basically turn the stream into an Iterator in order to call hasNext() on it, and if true, turn the Iterator back into a Stream. This is inefficient in that all subsequent operations on the stream will go through the Iterator's hasNext() and next() methods, which also implies that the stream is effectively processed sequentially (even if it's later turned parallel). However, this does allow you to test the stream without buffering up all of its elements.

There is probably a way to do this using a Spliterator instead of an Iterator. This potentially allows the returned stream to have the same characteristics as the input stream, including running in parallel.