The definition of a functional Interface in Java 8 says:
A functional interface is defined as any interface that has exactly one explicitly declared abstract method. (The qualification is necessary because an interface may have non-abstract default methods.) This is why functional interfaces used to be called Single Abstract Method (SAM) interfaces, a term that is still sometimes seen.
So how come we have this:
List<Double> temperature =
new ArrayList<Double>(Arrays.asList(new Double[] { 20.0, 22.0, 22.5 }));
temperature.sort((a, b) -> a > b ? -1 : 1);
As the sort method in List is:
default void sort(Comparator<? super E> c) {
Object[] a = this.toArray();
Arrays.sort(a, (Comparator) c);
ListIterator<E> i = this.listIterator();
for (Object e : a) {
i.next();
i.set((E) e);
}
}
And the lambda expression says:
Lambda Expression should be assignable to a Functional Interface
The Comparator interface has two abstract methods which are compare and equals and is annotated with @FunctionalInterface. Does not this violate the definition of a functional interface having only one abstract method?
It is true that the Comparator interface has 2 abstract methods. But one of them is equals, which overrides the equals method defined in the Object class, and this method doesn't count.
From @FunctionalInterface:
If an interface declares an abstract method overriding one of the public methods of
java.lang.Object, that also does not count toward the interface's abstract method count since any implementation of the interface will have an implementation fromjava.lang.Objector elsewhere.
As such, this makes the Comparator interface a functional interface where the functional method is compare(o1, o2).
The lambda expression (a, b) -> a > b ? -1 : 1 complies with that contract: it declares 2 parameters and return an int.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With