What is the most suitable container just for strings holding in some array with non-predetermined upper boundary, which length is unknown on it's creation.
For simple code like:
var list = new SomeContainer(); // size is unknown for()/foreach()/do()/while() // any loop { list.Add(string); } Is it StringCollection as optimized Collection for string, or just Collection<string> or List<string> or ArrayList ? What is the different between them?
Method#1: Using split() method The split method is used to split the strings and store them in the list. The built-in method returns a list of the words in the string, using the “delimiter” as the delimiter string.
StringCollection is a collection of strings. In this article, learn how to take advantages of StringCollection methods and properties to manage a collection of strings.
StringCollection class is a new addition to the . NET Framework class library that represents a collection of strings. StringCollection class is defined in the System. Collections. Specialized namespace.
For what you need, List<string> is probably the most versatile. StringCollection was handy in 1.1, when (without generics) you needed specific classes for typed collections. Collection<string> is handy if you want to subclass it to provide validation etc.
Either way, in 3.5, LINQ will provide lots of additional methods for them - but without LINQ, List<T> has more features (Find, Sort, etc)
A List<T> would be the most efficient.
The Collection<T> class is just a wrapper for another type of list, the parameterless constructor initialises the Collection<T> with a List<T>.
An ArrayList is essentially the same as a List<object>, so you would have to cast the items to String when reading from it.
A StringCollection is just a type safe wrapper for an ArrayList.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With