Array Constructor Dependency With StructureMap

Question

I've some ITask concretes types defines in my TaskRegistry:

public class TaskResigstry : Registry
{
    public TaskResigstry()
    {
        ForRequestedType<IBootstrapperTask>().TheDefaultIsConcreteType<StartTasks>();

        ForRequestedType<ITask>().TheDefaultIsConcreteType<FirstTask>();
        ForRequestedType<ITask>().AddConcreteType<SecondTask>();
        ForRequestedType<ITask>().AddConcreteType<ThirdTask>();
    }
}

And my StartTasks

public class StartTasks : IBootstrapperTask
{
    public StartTasks(ITask[] tasks)
    {
        foreach(var task in tasks)
        {
            task.Run();
        }
    }
}

How can i inject the ITask[] constructor parameter using StructureMap ?

Thanks.

Answer 1

If you want to inject an Array there's a method for that in the fluent interface...

ForRequestedType<IBootStrapperTask>().TheDefault.Is.OfConcreteType<StartTasks>()
     .TheArrayOf<ITask>().Contains(
            y => {
                y.OfConcreteType<Task1>();
                y.OfConcreteType<Task2>();
                y.OfConcreteType<Task3>();
            });

If you want to go down the route of an accepting an IEnumerable<T> in your constructor as far as I can see things start to become a little more complicated. You can specify and build the constructor argument like so:-

ForRequestedType<IBootStrapperTask>().TheDefault.Is.OfConcreteType<StartTasks>()
            .CtorDependency<IEnumerable<ITask>>().Is(i => {
                i.Is.ConstructedBy(c => {
                    return new List<ITask> { 
                           c.GetInstance<Task1>(), 
                           c.GetInstance<Task2>(), 
                           c.GetInstance<Task3>()
                    };
                });
            });

If you want all the registered types you could make a custom IBuildInterceptor that accesses all the registered types via the CreateInstanceArray method on the BuildSession but I get the feeling I might be going down the wrong road there.

I'd love to be corrected that this is a lot easier :).